Preaching to the choir

Hey, state: When you know that the truth is one thing, but you do your absolute damndest to lead the jury to believe it is really something else, you're doing a bad thing. I don't really care how much of a "good faith basis" you can claim you have for clinging to your believe that the truth could be something else. You and I both know it isn't. I know you have personally confronted the real truth.

You were probably going to win, anyway. Was it really necessary to risk an ethics complaint and possibly run afoul of an appellate court mandate? Were you just so pissed at me for winning the first round that you had to do something to make sure I was as pissed no matter the outcome of round two?