tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post2067321488252852334..comments2024-01-02T10:09:58.744-08:00Comments on Preaching to the choir: Amanda Knox and the serial killerShttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comBlogger275125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-74508253246129310802021-06-28T05:24:01.233-07:002021-06-28T05:24:01.233-07:00I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 wit...I was diagnosed as HEPATITIS B carrier in 2013 with fibrosis of the<br />liver already present. I started on antiviral medications which<br />reduced the viral load initially. After a couple of years the virus<br />became resistant. I started on HEPATITIS B Herbal treatment from<br />ULTIMATE LIFE CLINIC (www.ultimatelifeclinic.com) in March, 2020. Their<br />treatment totally reversed the virus. I did another blood test after<br />the 6 months long treatment and tested negative to the virus. Amazing<br />treatment! This treatment is a breakthrough for all HBV carriers.MATINAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03056834682621326306noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-80577143811755657702016-06-04T18:47:32.249-07:002016-06-04T18:47:32.249-07:00Why did Amanda Knox falsely accuse Patrick Lumumba...Why did Amanda Knox falsely accuse Patrick Lumumba? Isn't that sort of, you know, a horrible thing to do to someone? Even if she did not murder Meredith, she was still guilty of putting an innocent man in prison. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-79350559727666322262015-11-05T04:31:14.122-08:002015-11-05T04:31:14.122-08:00Hurrah, that’s what I was trying to get for, just ...Hurrah, that’s what I was trying to get for, just what a stuff Presented at this blog!! Thanks admin of the site. <a href="https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/mark-curry" rel="nofollow">MacFarlane Curry</a><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00536647169868657088noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-5257042924023606822015-04-03T17:15:19.263-07:002015-04-03T17:15:19.263-07:00halides1
Is it true that you are ‘denying’ that ...halides1 <br /><br />Is it true that you are ‘denying’ that you are a Holocaust denier on a site that promotes justice for the murder victim in this case.<br />While deleting all mentions of your unfortunate taste in ‘sceptical political websites’ on your own blog.<br />What gives? If, as you claim, you are not a holocaust denier why hide ‘your lamp under a bushel’?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-87604095959865337832014-04-21T22:57:10.931-07:002014-04-21T22:57:10.931-07:00"Tired crap" = truth and logic. While I ..."Tired crap" = truth and logic. While I do agree it's likely the high court will uphold these bogus convictions, I will never agree the convictions are at all justified. The truth of what happened to Meredith is plain as day for anyone who wants to see it to do so. Why so many are so fixated on maintaining the fiction that Amanda had anything to do with Rudy Guede's crime will never make any sense.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-3131771286858164072014-04-21T22:20:49.943-07:002014-04-21T22:20:49.943-07:00Mignini had Carlizzi arrested for defamation in 20...Mignini had Carlizzi arrested for defamation in 2006 and the rest of your article is the same tired crap the Amanda Knox cult has been propogating, yawn. I see the FOA camp are out in force with their stupid "guilter" ad hominems.<br />Those two killers are going down come their final appeal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-17070392377216176922014-04-14T07:36:18.598-07:002014-04-14T07:36:18.598-07:00You are right, and let me add two very important d...You are right, and let me add two very important details with regards to that knife: <br /><br />(A) The knife doesn't match the wounds on Meredith; <br /><br />(B) The knife doesn't match the bloody imprint left on the bed. <br /><br />Furthermore, in Amanda's purse there is no damage from the blade of a knife (at variance with Mignini's "explanation" of why the knife was allegedly carried from Raffale's apartment to the cottage).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17489890918619961812noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-60620924355657154252014-03-13T02:11:40.630-07:002014-03-13T02:11:40.630-07:00S.
I wonder your a lawyer could you please find t...S.<br /> I wonder your a lawyer could you please find the Supreme Court ruling that says that the constitution overrides treaties somewhere. The reason I ask is I heard that the first trial judge didn't let the defense question Rudy . Doesn't that violate the constitution .Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03296363340031434333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-37902281089924270502014-03-09T17:47:52.070-07:002014-03-09T17:47:52.070-07:00Dear Sir
I leave you with this thought it has be...Dear Sir <br /> I leave you with this thought it has been proven that mignini had an enemies listAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03296363340031434333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-36808518339454788802014-02-03T05:41:42.218-08:002014-02-03T05:41:42.218-08:00Thanks for replying. They all makes perfect sense....Thanks for replying. They all makes perfect sense. Of course, the local police who arrived first would have noticed the footprints too had they between noticeable. And absolutely all bathrooms will be full of DNA. Thanks again. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-39134153492809140892014-02-02T08:15:18.271-08:002014-02-02T08:15:18.271-08:00Yes, of course, Amanda's DNA is in the bathroo...Yes, of course, Amanda's DNA is in the bathroom she used. There is no spot in anyone's house that would have more of his/her DNA than the bathroom. And, yes, Meredith's DNA was there, as well. Also, it's clear that Guede went in there and washed some of the blood off, so some drops of Meredith's blood are in there.<br /><br />But anyone who tells you that when there is a drop of blood with more than one DNA profile found, you can tell whose blood it is is flat out lying to you. There is no way to tell that a drop of blood is actually made from one person's blood mixed with another person's blood. That's just absolutely not possible.<br /><br />The insane guilters will go on about the quantity of the DNA in that bidet sample meaning it couldn't have come from anything other than blood because no other skin cells or body fluids would excrete and leave that quantity of DNA. Which just makes you scratch your head and wonder if they understand exactly what goes on in a bathroom.<br /><br />That drop is blood and does contain both DNA profiles, but it does not mean that Amanda and Meredith were both bleeding. The most obvious explanation is that it is Meredith's blood that landed on a spot in the bathroom where Amanda's DNA was already present.<br /><br />As for how she didn't notice the footprints in the hallway, check out the crime scene photos. When you see the close-up photos of the footprints, you can see them. But when you look at the picture of the hallway, they're not noticeable, really. They're hard to pick out when you're not looking for them. Here we have a 20 year-old girl, who people have described as a little oblivious, who is just running home to take a shower and change her clothes before spending a long holiday weekend with the new boy she is utterly infatuated with. It's totally normal that she didn't notice those footprints. My understanding of the crime scene is that no one else noticed them, either, until after Meredith's body was found and they started looking closely at the house as a crime scene. I've never read anything that says that the other roommates, the first police on scene, etc. noticed those footprints before the door to Meredith's room was opened.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-86063312310811048232014-02-02T03:58:53.256-08:002014-02-02T03:58:53.256-08:00Sorry I meant "as SHE went home for her showe...Sorry I meant "as SHE went home for her shower". I'm typing from my phone with autocorrect :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-56439789998782808962014-02-02T03:56:22.857-08:002014-02-02T03:56:22.857-08:00Oh one other thing I forgot about - if Rudy left b...Oh one other thing I forgot about - if Rudy left bloody footprints in the hallway as he was walking out, did Amanda not see these as age went home for her shower? I've read about her being weirded out by the open door and the bits of blood in the bathroom, but nothing about the bloody footprints in the hallway (unless they were really faint and could only be seen via luminol?).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-70995344970285573782014-02-02T03:49:44.412-08:002014-02-02T03:49:44.412-08:00Thanks so much for the detailed reply. Everything ...Thanks so much for the detailed reply. Everything you said seems very plausible - sure of course the mop would have been tested and you wouldn't be standing with that if you'd been cleaning a murder scene! Do you know about the blood in the bidet? I can't find any info on that other than it being Amanda's mixed with Meredith's. It most definitely seems to be a total stitch up - all the focus on these two whilst Rudy almost goes unnoticed and will be out soon. Shame on the Italian police and legal system. Two young people's lives needlessly ruined when they already have the killer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-25471193927831019172014-02-01T11:07:10.148-08:002014-02-01T11:07:10.148-08:001) Rudy didn't have to face the door to lock i...1) Rudy didn't have to face the door to lock it. That hallway is pretty narrow. He went first to the bathroom, then walked out, I'd guess locking the door on his way out. Body at a 90 degree angle to the door is a perfectly natural way to stand while locking a door.<br /><br />I don't think Amanda was trying to insist Meredith "locked" her door. I think this was a lost in translation thing in that chaos. Remember Amanda didn't have strong command of Italian at the time. I think she was trying to say it was normal for Meredith to leave her door closed. <br /><br />2) Way too much is made of this. There were so many people there, all who saw something or surmised something. Either someone said something that she heard or she just assumed that based on the layout of the room. (Meredith's room was pretty tiny; everything would be by the wardrobe.)<br /><br />3) Have you ever come home to find something weird at your home? You call the police, but you're a little worried you're going to be made to look foolish when there's nothing really wrong. Raf and Amanda didn't know what they were finding. I don't think there's anything terribly weird about him hanging up, either out or nervousness or by mistake. I also think it's totally normal to see everything you expect to see in your home and say nothing seems to have been taken. Of course they wouldn't have known if smaller things like jewelry or money was taken, but I have called 911 when my own home was burglarized and said nothing seemed to be missing as I sat in my living room and could see my tv, my dvr, etc. Of course, lots of stuff had been taken.<br /><br />4) Why Amanda and Raf were outside with the mop has been well-covered. Raf had a bum pipe in his house and didn't own a mop (typical bachelor guy). Amanda came home to shower and was going to take the mop back with her, but forgot it as she was weirded out by the slightly off things she saw. She went back to get Raf and bring him back. Once they decided this really was worth a call to the cops, they went outside to wait. This time, they remembered to bring the mop. (That mop was tested, you know, and showed absolutely no signs of having been in contact with blood, Meredith's DNA, etc. It was quite clearly not used in a clean-up that morning.)<br /><br />The only way Amanda and Raffaele's behavior that morning and after makes any sense is if they had no idea what had happened at that home. Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-83843982379391286602014-02-01T09:16:10.771-08:002014-02-01T09:16:10.771-08:00Sorry, I meant four things don't make sense!Sorry, I meant four things don't make sense!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-17247235111454688802014-02-01T09:13:18.076-08:002014-02-01T09:13:18.076-08:00I agree that Amanda is innocent but three things d...I agree that Amanda is innocent but three things don't make sense to me:<br /><br />1. The locked door - Rudy's bloody footprints show him walking away from the bedroom. To lock the door he'd have had to turn around therefore leaving at least one footprint, but there aren't any. So who locked the door? Also why did Meredith insist to the local police that Meredith often locked her door so this was nothing to worry about. Yet Filomena disputed this and said she never locked the door and encouraged them to break it open. <br /><br />2. How did Amanda know that Meredith was killed by the wardrobe when she didn't see inside the room, and when the police kicked the door in Amanda and her boyfriend were in the kitchen so didn't see Meredith in the room.<br /><br />3. Rafaelle's 211 calls. He hung up mid question (as if to consult Amanda) and then rang back. He also stated nothing had been taken in the break-in. How did he know this? <br /><br />4. When the local police turned up with the mobile phones, why was Amanda standing outside with a mop? What was she cleaning? And more importantly WHY was she cleaning? <br /><br />I truly believe their innocence and think they have been made scapegoats to help Rudy get a reduced sentence. Apparently Rudy's adoptive family are very wealthy and give money to the police. However I wonder if Amanda went back and found Meredith, panicked, possibly thinking she could be somehow blamed. Maybe she went back to get Rafaelle and they locked the bedroom door in order to buy themselves time to think and also clean. <br /><br />Channel 5 in the UK have done a very interesting documentary where they hired forensic experts and every piece of "key" evidence was refuted. They even proved that the break-in did indeed happen and Rudy could have climbed up to the window with ease. So none of the evidence can place Amanda or Rafaelle in Meredith's bedroom. However I just wonder whether Amanda discovered Meredith and panicked. And maybe this is why she and Rafaelle have changed their stories so many times - not because they are guilty, but because they were worried about placing themselves there by accident in case of implication?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-7896607465563616232013-09-16T09:00:13.059-07:002013-09-16T09:00:13.059-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Harry Raghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01045813494850661259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-31012658343960880462011-12-13T02:38:55.389-08:002011-12-13T02:38:55.389-08:00Hi there, this is Michelle Moore. I wanted to try ...Hi there, this is Michelle Moore. I wanted to try (again) to leave you the link that will give you the low down on the infamous "Harry Rag".<br />This gal wrote a great blog and the responses from Harry put him in a place of being straightened out.<br />You have to copy and paste, sorry:<br />http://www.bookingmama.net/2011/03/review-murder-in-italy.html<br />Comments are superb!!!!Michelle Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08726786018572430008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-8547464723680011872011-12-13T02:34:20.774-08:002011-12-13T02:34:20.774-08:00Wait, that was the wrong address...I'll get th...Wait, that was the wrong address...I'll get the correct one to you tomorrow hopefully. Thanks,<br />michelleMichelle Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08726786018572430008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-38430125373097985152011-12-13T02:32:50.106-08:002011-12-13T02:32:50.106-08:00DID YOU HEAR? AMANDA AND RAFAELE WERE NOT ONLY ACQ...DID YOU HEAR? AMANDA AND RAFAELE WERE NOT ONLY ACQUITTED, THEY FOUND COMPLETELY INNOCNENT OF THE CRIME.<br />The guilters were so full of it, they have no where to go. <br />I had found a great blog:<br />jmeyers@ctpost.com<br />and it shared who Harry Rag really is. I think it's Peter Quennell, who is too chicken to say who he really is.Michelle Moorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08726786018572430008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-54669973742981659002011-10-04T09:46:45.258-07:002011-10-04T09:46:45.258-07:00Yes, they were acquitted. Absolved, actually. With...Yes, they were acquitted. Absolved, actually. With the appellate court declaring they did not do the crime.<br /><br />The crazy prosecutor, who himself might soon be in the clink as he is a convicted felon, is predictably blustering about how this second trial was conducted under "unacceptable" media pressure. Uh, pot meet kettle. Remember all the publicity before and during the first trial? All the false stories you leaked to the press? Truth lost out in the first trial thanks to your work with tabloid journalists. Thankfully, truth won out the second time.<br /><br />And tragically, Meredith Kercher's family are left feeling like they have no idea what really happened to their beloved. Because all this time, they were told by the prosecution that there were 2 people besides Rudy Guede involved in this crime. There weren't, but courts and experts played along with that theory because Mignini and Comodi (also evil, as Orofar points out) were just so dang sure that Amanda and Raffaele were involved. But they weren't.<br /><br />So now it's time to go back to square one, look at the crime scene as it really was, without injecting theories into it that make no sense. The crime scene speaks fairly clearly to what happened. It was Rudy Guede. By himself. Here's hoping everyone can get to a point of acknowledging this simple truth that should have been obvious all along.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-58112971510038097372011-10-04T08:43:26.982-07:002011-10-04T08:43:26.982-07:00Well AK (and RS) were acquitted yesterday - at lea...Well AK (and RS) were acquitted yesterday - at least belatedly justice was served. Thanks for so clearly seeing what a total miscarriage of justice the first trial was. In fact, ever thinking the two were suspects was whacky but then you figured out Mignini was just that too. <br />BTW - The assistant prosecutor Manuela (Flush The) Comodi was pretty evil as well.onofararnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-62136238573572492852011-09-27T12:06:55.824-07:002011-09-27T12:06:55.824-07:00People still cling to the idea that she must have ...People still cling to the idea that she must have had a liiiiitttle something to do with it for their own comfort. It's hard to accept the fact that completely innocent people really can get caught up in something like this and be accused for absolutely no good reason. But it does happen. And there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that she had anything to do with it. In fact, I think it's pretty much stone cold fact that she did not have anything to do with it. That she and Raffaele were at his apartment as they said all along, perhaps fuzzy on the details because normal people don't pay all that much attention to exactly what time they finished cooking dinner, what time they went to bed, etc. That Rudy Guede acted completely and totally alone, as the vast, vast majority of such rape/murders go.<br /><br />It's scary to think that completely innocent people could be convicted without having SOME involvement, but it's reality and by any objective, rational measure of this evidence, it is what happened here.Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12429147325673256508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2248881149749925934.post-63430626691817485602011-09-27T06:56:57.747-07:002011-09-27T06:56:57.747-07:00Oh...and this "unanimous" decision peopl...Oh...and this "unanimous" decision people seem to get bent on saying that is the sole evidence of guilt...<br />Haven't you watched any news of people being exonerated after a unanimous decision by the jurors in lots of cases? I've been hearing tons of cases where people are getting exonerated because of DNA evidence that we didn't use back then. And I supposed during segregation that all the white people on the jury hanging the black man were ALWAYS correct...<br />Ignorance must be bliss. I want it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com